McLaren to release F1 successor

Posted on May 14th, 2008 in F1 by admin

After the “farewell” with Mercedes McLaren engineers can now go into their own projects…

mclarenp11_03.jpg

For now McLaren has two of them - P11 and P12. The first to be released in 2010, and then settle in the so-called small niche of superkars, somewhere near Ferrari F430. McLaren, according to preliminary data, will be easier and more compact. While British journalists promise P11 will be equipped with 550 h/p V8, in other words, if prices are equal to the Italian, McLaren will make a real market bomb.

P12 is given a role of a successor of legendary F1. In the Internet leaked official technical documentation, in accordance with it new super McLaren will be equipped with a V10 with 600 hp. F1 had under the hood exactly the same hp, but in twelve cylinders. so with new technology we can expect it to be even more faster.

3 Responses to 'McLaren to release F1 successor'

Subscribe to comments with RSS

  1. paul said,

    on May 5th, 2009 at 7:36 am

    where did you learn your english admin ? Its woeful, that means extremely bad. Do you ever re-read you copy before publishing ? Maybe you should try to next time.

  2. Mookster said,

    on May 27th, 2009 at 5:42 pm

    Ahem… (Quote) “Do you ever re-read YOU copy before publishing” You copy? And no caps at the start of the sentence? And no capital E for English? And a space before the question marks? No apostrophe in “it’s”? Wow, you really shot yourself in the foot there matey! You don’t even capitalise your own name. Shameful…

  3. Kashgar said,

    on May 29th, 2009 at 3:25 pm

    “McLaren, according to preliminary data, will be easier and more compact.” - So they are downsizing? Or what?

    “McLaren will make a real market bomb.” - Bomb, like, it will be a failure, or bomb, as in, it will blow up with success? I’m confused.

    “In the Internet leaked official technical documentation, in accordance with it new super McLaren…” - What?

    Anyway, for a real question, was the ‘official technical documentation’ confirmed to be real? If so, by whom was it confirmed?

Post a comment