Comments on: McLaren to release F1 successor http://autos.webhostingoverview.com/2008/05/14/mclaren-to-release-f1-successor/ Automobile News & Reviews Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:04:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2 By: Suzi Salehi http://autos.webhostingoverview.com/2008/05/14/mclaren-to-release-f1-successor/#comment-6999 Suzi Salehi Thu, 07 Jul 2011 13:44:09 +0000 http://autos.webhostingoverview.com/2008/05/14/mclaren-to-release-f1-successor/#comment-6999 Bravo very beautiful blog ! http://www.WS-piecesauto.com Bravo very beautiful blog !
http://www.WS-piecesauto.com

]]> By: Jack Zhong http://autos.webhostingoverview.com/2008/05/14/mclaren-to-release-f1-successor/#comment-5475 Jack Zhong Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:49:29 +0000 http://autos.webhostingoverview.com/2008/05/14/mclaren-to-release-f1-successor/#comment-5475 McLaren..Amazing work McLaren..Amazing work

]]> By: deepanshu http://autos.webhostingoverview.com/2008/05/14/mclaren-to-release-f1-successor/#comment-5208 deepanshu Fri, 23 Jul 2010 10:32:31 +0000 http://autos.webhostingoverview.com/2008/05/14/mclaren-to-release-f1-successor/#comment-5208 hey buddy i agree with paul and mookster that your vocabulary in this post is toooo bad but the thing i like is new news about sports car i m crazy about sports cars thanks for posting hey buddy
i agree with paul and mookster
that your vocabulary in this post is toooo bad

but the thing i like is new news about sports car
i m crazy about sports cars

thanks for posting

]]> By: Kashgar http://autos.webhostingoverview.com/2008/05/14/mclaren-to-release-f1-successor/#comment-2385 Kashgar Fri, 29 May 2009 19:25:25 +0000 http://autos.webhostingoverview.com/2008/05/14/mclaren-to-release-f1-successor/#comment-2385 "McLaren, according to preliminary data, will be easier and more compact." - So they are downsizing? Or what? "McLaren will make a real market bomb." - Bomb, like, it will be a failure, or bomb, as in, it will blow up with success? I'm confused. "In the Internet leaked official technical documentation, in accordance with it new super McLaren..." - What? Anyway, for a real question, was the 'official technical documentation' confirmed to be real? If so, by whom was it confirmed? “McLaren, according to preliminary data, will be easier and more compact.” - So they are downsizing? Or what?

“McLaren will make a real market bomb.” - Bomb, like, it will be a failure, or bomb, as in, it will blow up with success? I’m confused.

“In the Internet leaked official technical documentation, in accordance with it new super McLaren…” - What?

Anyway, for a real question, was the ‘official technical documentation’ confirmed to be real? If so, by whom was it confirmed?

]]> By: Mookster http://autos.webhostingoverview.com/2008/05/14/mclaren-to-release-f1-successor/#comment-2378 Mookster Wed, 27 May 2009 21:42:37 +0000 http://autos.webhostingoverview.com/2008/05/14/mclaren-to-release-f1-successor/#comment-2378 Ahem... (Quote) "Do you ever re-read YOU copy before publishing" You copy? And no caps at the start of the sentence? And no capital E for English? And a space before the question marks? No apostrophe in "it's"? Wow, you really shot yourself in the foot there matey! You don't even capitalise your own name. Shameful... Ahem… (Quote) “Do you ever re-read YOU copy before publishing” You copy? And no caps at the start of the sentence? And no capital E for English? And a space before the question marks? No apostrophe in “it’s”? Wow, you really shot yourself in the foot there matey! You don’t even capitalise your own name. Shameful…

]]> By: paul http://autos.webhostingoverview.com/2008/05/14/mclaren-to-release-f1-successor/#comment-2341 paul Tue, 05 May 2009 11:36:44 +0000 http://autos.webhostingoverview.com/2008/05/14/mclaren-to-release-f1-successor/#comment-2341 where did you learn your english admin ? Its woeful, that means extremely bad. Do you ever re-read you copy before publishing ? Maybe you should try to next time. where did you learn your english admin ? Its woeful, that means extremely bad. Do you ever re-read you copy before publishing ? Maybe you should try to next time.

]]>